Rollup of 5 pull requests #150119
Closed
Rollup of 5 pull requests #150119
+294
−62
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This synchronizes the list with the current state of `sysctl` on macOS “Tahoe” 26.2. r? @Amanieu
Co-authored-by: SATVIKsynopsis <[email protected]>
…nieu Expand `str_as_str` to more types Tracking issue: rust-lang#130366 ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#643 This PR expands `str_from_str` feature and adds analogous methods to more types. Namely: - `&CStr` - `&[T]`, `&mut [T]` - `&OsStr` - `&Path` - `&ByteStr`, `&mut ByteStr` (tracking issue: rust-lang#134915) (technically was not part of ACP)
… r=wesleywiser Set -Cpanic=abort in windows-msvc stack protector tests I ran into a test failure with the 32-bit windows test on rust-lang#117192, one of the tests has been incorrectly passing (until my change!) because it is picking up the stack protector from another function. I've tried to prevent that happening again by adding CHECK-DAGs for the start and end of each function. I've also done my best to correct the comments, some were based on the fact that we used to run these tests with unwinding panics, but LLVM doesn't add protectors to function with SEH funclets so it's must more straightforward for these tests to use `-Cpanic=abort`.
std_detect: AArch64 Darwin: expose SME F16F16 and B16B16 features This synchronizes the list with the current state of `sysctl` on macOS “Tahoe” 26.2. r? ``@Amanieu``
…ivooeo tests/run-make-cargo/same-crate-name-and-macro-name: New regression test Closes rust-lang#71259 which just **E-needs-test**. See rust-lang#71259 (comment) for a good description of what we should test (which we do in this PR). The project we add fails with an old nightly without the fix: ```console $ cargo +nightly-2020-03-10 run Compiling consumer v0.1.0 (/home/martin/src/rust-same-crate-same-macro/tests/run-make-cargo/same-crate-name-and-macro-name/consumer) Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.14s Running `target/debug/consumer` thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)` left: `"version 1"`, right: `"version 2"`', src/main.rs:6:5 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ``` and passes with a recent toolchain: ```console $ cargo run warning: /home/martin/src/rust-same-crate-same-macro/tests/run-make-cargo/same-crate-name-and-macro-name/consumer/Cargo.toml: no edition set: defaulting to the 2015 edition while the latest is 2024 warning: /home/martin/src/rust-same-crate-same-macro/tests/run-make-cargo/same-crate-name-and-macro-name/mylib_v1/Cargo.toml: no edition set: defaulting to the 2015 edition while the latest is 2024 warning: /home/martin/src/rust-same-crate-same-macro/tests/run-make-cargo/same-crate-name-and-macro-name/mylib_v2/Cargo.toml: no edition set: defaulting to the 2015 edition while the latest is 2024 Compiling mylib v2.0.0 (/home/martin/src/rust-same-crate-same-macro/tests/run-make-cargo/same-crate-name-and-macro-name/mylib_v2) Compiling mylib v1.0.0 (/home/martin/src/rust-same-crate-same-macro/tests/run-make-cargo/same-crate-name-and-macro-name/mylib_v1) Compiling consumer v0.1.0 (/home/martin/src/rust-same-crate-same-macro/tests/run-make-cargo/same-crate-name-and-macro-name/consumer) Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.14s Running `target/debug/consumer` ``` in other words, the test tests what it should and will catch regressions.
Fixed ICE for EII with multiple defaults due to duplicate definition in nameres r? ``@jieyouxu`` (since you looked at the other one) Fixes rust-lang#149982 Previously a [fix was proposed](rust-lang#149985) by ``@SATVIKsynopsis`` which I marked as co-author on the first commit for the test they contributed. I'm closing this previous PR. Duplicate definitions of EII defaults shouldn't be possible. I want to still panic on them, since I want to know when other bugs exist. However, in this case the duplicate was caused by something more subtle: both eiis have the same name, and as such a "duplicate definition" error is given. However, the compiler gracefully continues compiling despite that, assuming only one of the two EIIs is actually defined. Both defaults then name resolve, and find the same single remaining EII, and both register themselves to be its default, breaking the single-default assumption. The solution: I added a span-delayed-bug, to make sure we only panic if we hadn't previously had this duplicate definition name resolution error. Thanks to ``@SATVIKsynopsis`` for their attempt. Adding a diagnostic here could make some sense, but nonetheless I think this is the better solution here <3 Also thanks to ``@yaahc`` for debugging help, she made me understand the name resolution of the situation so much better and is just lovely in general :3 The last commit is something I tried during debugging, which felt like a relevant test to add (one where both eiis also have the same function name)
rustbot
added
A-run-make
Member
Author
|
Rollup of everything. @bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Contributor
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-author
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
str_as_strto more types #145933 (Expandstr_as_strto more types)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup